Online dating, once a fringe and stigmatized activity, is now a $2 billion industry. But is this a positive development or something to be concerned about?.
Table of contents
- Cost of ASU
- Online dating lowers self-esteem and increases depression, studies say
- First Evidence That Online Dating Is Changing the Nature of Society - MIT Technology Review
- Related Stories
It's urgent to analyse it. Kaufmann isn't the only intellectual analysing the new landscape of love. Behavioural economist Dan Ariely is researching online dating because it affects to offer a solution for a market that wasn't working very well. Oxford evolutionary anthropologist Robin Dunbar will soon publish a book called The Science of Love and Betrayal , in which he wonders whether science can helps us with our romantic relationships.
Cost of ASU
And one of France's greatest living philosophers, Alain Badiou, is poised to publish In Praise of Love , in which he argues that online dating sites destroy our most cherished romantic ideal, namely love. Ariely started thinking about online dating because one of his colleagues down the corridor, a lonely assistant professor in a new town with no friends who worked long hours, failed miserably at online dating. Ariely wondered what had gone wrong. Surely, he thought, online dating sites had global reach, economies of scale and algorithms ensuring utility maximisation this way of talking about dating, incidentally, explains why so many behavioural economists spend Saturday nights getting intimate with single-portion lasagnes.
Online dating is, Ariely argues, unremittingly miserable.
But it turns out people are much more like wine. When you taste the wine, you could describe it, but it's not a very useful description. But you know if you like it or don't.
And it's the complexity and the completeness of the experience that tells you if you like a person or not. And this breaking into attributes turns out not to be very informative.
Online dating lowers self-esteem and increases depression, studies say
So he decided to set up a website that could better deliver what people want to know about each other before they become attracted. His model was real dates. If you and I went out, and we went somewhere, I would look at how you react to the outside world. What music you like, what you don't like, what kind of pictures you like, how do you react to other people, what do you do in the restaurant. And through all these kind of non-explicit aspects, I will learn something about you.
His online system gave visitors an avatar with which to explore a virtual space.
First Evidence That Online Dating Is Changing the Nature of Society - MIT Technology Review
It wasn't about where you went to school and what's your religion; it was about something else, and it turns out it gave people much more information about each other, and they were much more likely to want to meet each other for a first date and for a second date. Badiou found the opposite problem with online sites: The septuagenarian Hegelian philosopher writes in his book of being in the world capital of romance Paris and everywhere coming across posters for Meetic , which styles itself as Europe's leading online dating agency.
Badiou worried that the site was offering the equivalent of car insurance: But love isn't like that, he complains. Love is, for him, about adventure and risk, not security and comfort.
Related Stories
But, as he recognises, in modern liberal society this is an unwelcome thought: And I think it's a philosophical task, among others, to defend it. Across Paris, Kaufmann is of a similar mind. He believes that in the new millennium a new leisure activity emerged. It was called sex and we'd never had it so good. Basically, sex had become a very ordinary activity that had nothing to do with the terrible fears and thrilling transgressions of the past.
All they needed to do was sign up, pay a modest fee getting a date costs less than going to see a film , write a blog or use a social networking site. Nothing could be easier. In a sense, though, sex and love are opposites. One is something that could but perhaps shouldn't be exchanged for money or non-financial favours; the other is that which resists being reduced to economic parameters.
The problem is that we want both, often at the same time, without realising that they are not at all the same thing. And online dating intensifies that confusion.
Kaufmann argues that in the new world of speed dating, online dating and social networking, the overwhelming idea is to have short, sharp engagements that involve minimal commitment and maximal pleasure. In this, he follows the Leeds-based sociologist Zygmunt Bauman , who proposed the metaphor of "liquid love" to characterise how we form connections in the digital age. It's easier to break with a Facebook friend than a real friend; the work of a split second to delete a mobile-phone contact. In his book Liquid Love, Bauman wrote that we "liquid moderns" cannot commit to relationships and have few kinship ties.
We incessantly have to use our skills, wits and dedication to create provisional bonds that are loose enough to stop suffocation, but tight enough to give a needed sense of security now that the traditional sources of solace family, career, loving relationships are less reliable than ever. And online dating offers just such chances for us to have fast and furious sexual relationships in which commitment is a no-no and yet quantity and quality can be positively rather than inversely related.
After a while, Kaufmann has found, those who use online dating sites become disillusioned. But all-pervasive cynicism and utilitarianism eventually sicken anyone who has any sense of human decency. When the players become too cold and detached, nothing good can come of it. He also comes across online addicts who can't move from digital flirting to real dates and others shocked that websites, which they had sought out as refuges from the judgmental cattle-market of real-life interactions, are just as cruel and unforgiving — perhaps more so.
Online dating has also become a terrain for a new — and often upsetting — gender struggle. The way we date has completely changed: The average age at which we settle down has steadily increased. Because obviously we women can only think about one thing at a time the irony! So far, so mansplainy. We now have so much choice that people endlessly cycle through their options, looking for their perfect partner in the belief they are just around the corner.
In a book called Date-onomics , author Jon Birger cheerfully proclaims: He points to the fact that women are going to university in greater numbers than men and argues a relative undersupply of university-educated men fundamentally changes their attitudes towards dating and sex, encouraging promiscuity. It leads him to some pretty weird conclusions, such as holding up Silicon Valley, with its notoriously high male: I think it would be naive to dismiss the idea that technology might be changing the way we form relationships, amplifying the differences in the way men and women engage with dating.
I see little evidence of technology fundamentally changing human nature, turning virginal millennials into an army of sex-obsessed zombies.