Dating johns gospel

The Gospel of John is the fourth of the canonical gospels. The work is anonymous, although it scholars agree that it was written by a separate author, John of Patmos, c. 95 with some parts possibly dating to Nero's reign in the early 60s.
Table of contents

Gospel of John - Wikipedia

We both agree that other factors must be considered as well, though you do feel more strongly about John 5: I believe there is an important difference in these two cases, however. To be sure, the majority is not always, or necessarily, right, but it should give the wise, careful scholar pause when the vast majority of those sharing his overall theological convictions come to different conclusions on a given issue. This was, and continues to be, my point. Rather than there being a lack of evidence, it appears, the issue rather seems to be that you do not accept the evidence I have already provided.

For my part, I continue to believe that the prima facie reading of John To my mind, at least, Dan, you have therefore not established the implausibility of a past-referring use of a present tense form of eimi in John 5: What is more, I am currently working on a major Johannine theology and hope to explore some of these issues in greater depth in this forthcoming volume.

Once again, thank you for honoring me with this thoughtful response.

This is a general comment: Instead of thinking John is completly independent of the Synoptics, I think John assumes knowledge of the Synotics on the part of his readers who I think are both Jewish and Gentile in audience. Andreas, thanks for your kind remarks. But you also mention something that I would take issue with: I am NOT convinced of the rightness of my view; I am convinced by clear, unambiguous data.

As evidence of this, anyone who knows me knows that I change my views all the time—far more often than some are comfortable with.

John 5:2 and the Date of John’s Gospel: A Response to Dan Wallace

You even admit that the case you make is possible, but not required by the data. Good grammatical method requires more than that. Otherwise, one can base his theological views on what is grammatically possible but not on what is probable. I can commend you for being one of the first to even notice my article in Biblica and for interacting with it seriously.

But this raises an important issue: Designated as one of seven potential apostles courtesy of John Also known as John the Apostle, a Palestinian Jew, he is thought to be synonymous with the author of three additional Johannine Epistles and the Revelation.

Dating of The Gospel of John

Barnett , 73 , in cross-referencing with significant historiographical events in Mark cf. John is impugned for being a lowly Galilean fishermen, unlearned and illiterate Acts 4: Speculation that the author was subject to later Gnostic influence have been tempered by the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, containing many Essenic parallels to John both in theme and wordplay, as well as by the recovery of the Rylands and Egerton Papyri.

Dating the New Testament

Dating John late in the 2nd Century has ceased being in vogue partly due to the implications, mentioned earlier, of significant archaeological discoveries. An earlier date for John has not been without advocacy, the most catalysing of which arrived via J. An early date of AD, just prior to the zenith of the Jewish-Roman Wars, would be my personal conclusion, though AD is not an inappropriate suggestion. The question is not mutually exclusive from the varying theories of authorship and date, but we shall attempt to approach the issue independently.

There is nothing explicit in the text itself, though the patristic testimony nominates Ephesus via Irenaeus quoted earlier and Eusebius. This logic is curbed somewhat if concessions are made to John being an evolving literary composition, with the final touches administered by later Johannine redactors. My problem with the Israel provenance theorem is that masterful authors, of whom John is the archetypal example, do not necessarily require present geographic affinity in order to recall with vividness and accuracy the narratives of their homeland.

Navigation menu

Observing the lack of a credible alternative, it is difficult to overlook Ephesus as the location of provenance. As a young convert with fairly limited Bible acumen, my response was naively to retrieve my New Testament and request that he read John Subsequent to this, he humbly replied that perhaps his stance was not as watertight as formerly presumed.


  • dating events in london tonight;
  • dating valentine & sons postcards;
  • An Introduction To The Gospel Of John | arraya.co.
  • free chatting and dating websites;
  • Dating the New Testament - John.

The Recent Growth of Johannine Studies. Is the New Testament History?